Voice Quality Impacts Listeners’ Perception And Intelligibility Of English
Abstract
The goal of this study is to see if there's a link between phonetic aspects of connected speech and listener response. It also clarifies listeners' comments on the speakers' voice quality and intelligibility to them. The listener's top and bottom picks for best and worst speakers are compared to the speaker's related speech and other phonetic properties. On the voice quality parameter, the first three characteristics were evaluated on a three-point scale: 'P' for 'Pleasant,"U' for 'Unpleasant,' and 'W' for 'Worst.' To determine the ranking order, each parameter's coded elements were assigned a fixed numerical value such as 3, 2, or 1. Following that, the 'Best' speaker, 'Worst' speaker, and Teaching Model ratings were calculated (T.M). Listeners' suggestions for the greatest and worst speakers were recorded. Different sorts of figures were employed to illustrate the findings for clarity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
Bansal, R. K.(1969). TheIntelligibility of Indian English: Measurements of the Intelligibility of Connected Speech, Sentence and Word Material, presented to Listeners of DifferentNationalities. Hyderabad: Central Institute of English.
Bansal, R.K.(1969). The Intelligibility of Indian English, Monograph No. 4, Madras. Orient Longmans Ltd.
Brown, G.(1990). Listening to Spoken English, (2nd Ed.). London: Longman.
Jaya Raju, S.(2005). Mutual Intelligibility of English among Different Nationalities: A Phonetic Study. Unpublished PhD. Hyderabad: CIEFL.
Luciano Canepari (2015) English Pronunciation & Accents. Geo social Applications of the Natural Phonetics & Tonetics Method.Lincom publications.
Smith, L.E & Nelson, C.L. (1985). International Intelligibility of English: Directions and Resources. World Englishes. Vol.4 No.3. UK: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Trask, R.L. (1996). A Dictionary of Language and Linguistics and Phonology, Routledge. London.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies