Acquisition of English Relative Clauses by Persian EFL Learners
Abstract
Due to their structural complexity, English relative clauses (RCs) are difficult to acquire for EFL learners. This study tested the predictions of seven major hypotheses proposed on the difficulty order of SS, SO, OO, and OS RCs for Persian EFL learners with different levels of English proficiency. Data was collected from 39 university students aged between 18 and 22 who performed a sentence comprehension task which consisted of 20 items involving reversible animate head nouns, with 5 items representing each of the SS, SO, OO, and OS RCs. Results showed that the determining factor in the difficulty order of the RCs for Persian EFL learners is the role of the head noun in the RC rather than the position of relativization, as some hypotheses predict. Moreover, Persian EFL learners opt for a linear parsing strategy in processing RC structures. Besides, Proficiency level did not bring about a drastic change in the difficulty order of the RCs.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: Wiley.
Bowerman, M. (1979). The acquisition of complex structures. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development, 285-306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Villiers, J. G., Flusberg, H. B. T., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M. (1979). Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 5, 499-518.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence form an empirical study on second language relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
Fox, B. A. (1987). The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the Absolutive Hypothesis? Language, 63.856–870.
Gass, S., & Ard, J. (1980). L2 data: Their relevance for language universals. TESOL Quarterly, 14(4), 443-452.
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Transfer, 29, 327-344.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
Gibson, E., & Schutze, C. (1999). Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunction do not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 263–279.
Gibson, E., Desmet, T., Grodner, D., Watson, D., & Ko, K. (2005). Reading relative clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 2, 313-353.
Gibson, E. & Wu, H. H. I. (2008). Processing Chinese Relative Clauses in Context. Retrieved online: tedlab.mit.edu/tedlab_website/.../Gibson%20&%20Wu%20subm.pdf
Hamilton, R. (1994). Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning, 44, 123-157.
Hawkins, J. A. (1987). Implicational universals as predictors of language acquisition. Linguistics 25, 453–73.
Hsiu-chuan, L. (2000). The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy revisited: A view from ergative languages. Working Papers in Linguistics 31:121-142. Department of Linguistics, University of Hawai'i at Ma-noa.
Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90, 3-27.
Hsin, A. (2005). The Difficulty Hierarchy in English Relative Clause Acquisition for Chinese EFL Students. (2005). Journal of English Teaching and Learning. Vol. 29:3, pp. 61-84.
Houston, J. R. (1978) The acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by native speakers of Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Campaign.
Hui Yin (2006). The role of processing strategies in Chinese. Proceedings of the 2006 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
Ina, M. (1982). Strategies and errors of relative pronouns. Language Studies 1, Hyogo University of Education, 47-57.
Ioup, G., & Kruse, A. (1977). Interference vs. structural complexity in second language acquisition: Language universals as a basis for sequencing. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77-Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 159-17,1). Washington, DC: TESOL.
Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53, 2, 285-323.
Karimi, S. (2001). Persian complex DPs: how mysterious are they? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46, 63-96.
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.
Keenan, E. L. (1975). Variation in universal grammar. In Fasold and R. Shuy (Eds.), Analysing variation in language. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602.
Kuno, S. (1975). The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 117-136.
MacDonald, M. C., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & Wells, J. B. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 58 (2009) 250–271
HMacWhinney, B.H (2005) The emergence of grammar from perspective taking. In Pecher, D and Zwaan, R., editors, HThe grounding of cognitionH.
MacWhinney, B., & Pleh, C. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95–141.
O’Grady W. (1999). Toward a new nativism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 621-633.
Ozeki, H. & Shirai, Y. (2007). Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 169–196.
Prideaux, G., & Baker, W. (1986). Current issues in linguistic theory: Vol. 46. Strategies and structures: The processing of relative clauses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prideaux, G. D. & Hogen, J. T. (1993). Markedness as a discourse management device: The role of alternative adverbial clause orders. Word, 44: 397–411.
Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 1-23.
Romaine, S. (1984). Relative clauses in child language, pidgins, and creoles. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 4, 257-281.
Sadighi, F. (1994). The acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by Chinese, Japanese, and Korean adult native speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 32(2), 141-153.
Sadighi, F., & Jafarpur, A. (1994). Is there a role for learner treatment in comprehending relative clauses? RELC Journal, 25, 1, 56-74.
Schumann, J. (1980). The acquisition of English relative clauses by second language learners. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition: Selected papers from the Los Angeles Second Language Research Forum (pp. 118-131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272-281.
Sheldon, A. (1977). On strategies for processing relative clauses: A comparison of children and adults. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 305-318.
Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of language. In C. Ferguson & D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 175-208). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Takashima, H. et al. (1994). Order of grammatical items in the government's approved textbooks and second language acquisition - Interrogatives and relative pronouns. Gendai Eigo Kyoiku 2: 48-53, 57. (In Japanese)
Tarallo, F. & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 33, 55-76.
Tavakolian, S. L. (1977). Structural principles in the acquisition of complex sentences. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 69–90.
Van der Lely, H. (1996). Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive interpretation. Lingua, 98, 243–272.
Wanner, E., & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach in comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119–161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wong, J. (1990). Learnability of relative clauses: A Hong Kong case. Paper presented at the Conference on the Teaching of English Language/Literature in the Hong Kong Context.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies