A Cognitive Corpus-based Study of Exocentric Compounds in English
Abstract
Exocentric compounding is a creative morphological process that contributes to the English lexicon. However, because it lacks a syntactic or semantic head, it was deemed an exceptional case in most word-formation literature and hence neglected. Previous work has only been limited to syntax-based grammar and the notion of headedness and thus failed to address the other linguistic rules that constrain exocentric compounds. The current paper aims to identify the frequency of exocentric compounds and thus to determine their viability. The research will also look into how conceptual metaphor and/or conceptual metonymy motivate exocentric compound formation. The results demonstrate that exocentric compounds are viable lexical units, generating content words (e.g., adjectives and adverbs) through productive word-formation processes, and extending word senses. The results also suggest that conceptual metonymy is more active than conceptual metaphor in the formation of exocentric compounds. The present findings have several implications for research on exocentric compounds, conceptual metonymy and conceptual metaphor.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, V. (1973). An introduction to modern English word-formation. London: Longman.
Adams, V. (2014). Complex Words in English. New York: Routledge.
Allen, M. R. (1979). Morphological investigations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs Cambridge, Mass, (1), 1-134.
Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2011). What is morphology? (Vol. 8). John Wiley & Sons.
Baker, P., Hardie, A., & McEnery, T. (2006). A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bauer, L. 1983. English word-formation. London: Cambridge.
Bauer, L. (1998). Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive? Linguistics 36(3), 403–422.
Bauer, L., & Renouf, A. (2001). A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29(2), 101–123.
Benczes, R. (2006). Creative compounding in English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2002). An Introduction to English Morphology: Words and Their Structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Fabb, N. (1998). Compounding. In A. Spencer & A. Zwicky (Eds.), The Handbook of Morphology (pp. 66-83). Oxford: Blackwell.
Grzega, J. (2002). Some thoughts on a cognitive onomasiological approach to word formation with special reference to English.
Onomasiology Online, 3, 55-81.
Halpern, J. (2000). Is English Segmentation Trivial? Technical report, CJK Dictionary Institute.
Hamawand, Z. (2011). Morphology in English: Word formation in cognitive grammar. London: Continuum.
Katamba, F. (2006). Morphology (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kornai, A. (2008). Mathematical linguistics. Berlin: Springer.
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980)
Langacker, R. W. (1973). Language and its structure: some fundamental linguistic concepts (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and language, 84(1), 50-64.
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panther, K. U., & Thornburg, L. (2003). The EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy in English grammar. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 215-232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. Metonymy in language and thought, 4, 17-60.
Spencer, A. (1991). Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stekauer, P. (2001). Fundamental principles of an onomasiological theory of English word-formation. Onomasiology Online, 2, 1-42.
Szymanek, B. (2005). The latest trends in English word-formation. In P. Štekauer, & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation (pp. 429-448). Springer, Dordrecht.
Ten Hacken, P. (2000). Derivation and compounding. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C., & Mugdan, J (Eds.), Morphologie / Morphology (pp. 349–360). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “Lexically related” and “Head of a word”. Linguistic inquiry, 12(2), 245-274.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies