English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Lecturers' perceptions of formative assessment integration in the Thai EAP context

Mark Treve

Abstract


Evaluation processes must be conceived in line with learner-centered emphasis though instruction in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) is grounded on learner-centered approaches, EAP- English for Academic Purpose, which is considered as a major important functional feature of the language. Formative evaluation is major evaluation approach that provides various advantages for EAP students. This study examined (n=50) the perception of lecturers in three Thai universities, including Walailak, of including the inclusion of formative assessments in EAP instruction. The findings showed that, despite several obstacles to its implementation, lecturers have adapted optimistic attitudes to the use of formative evaluation in EAP education through studies and interviews. In addition, the instructors knew the merits of EAP training assessment. However, the expertise and the knowledge required for the formational assessment of EAP instructions were not available to them. The main evaluation in the form of the final examination was summative. This study suggests that formative evaluation should be taken into account in the EAP curriculum.    


Keywords


EAP; learner-centered approach; formative assessment; obstacles; attitudes learner-centered approach; lecturer; obstacles; attitudes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aitken, R. (2000). Teacher perceptions of the use and value of formative assessment in secondary English programmes. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 15-20.

Alibakhshi, G., Ali, H. G., & Padiz, D. (2011). Teaching and testing ESP at Iranian universities: A critical view. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1346-1352.

Aslan, G. (2019). Learning organizations as predictors of academic achievement: An analysis on secondary schools. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 191-240. doi:10.14527/kuey.2019.006

Al-Kindy, S. (2009). Teachers’ attitudes towards continuous assessment and its effect on their work. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.om/Portal/sitebuilder/Sites/EPS/Arabic/IPS/Importa/tesol/5/Teachers%E2%80%99%20attitudes%20towards%20continuous%20assessment%20and%20its%20ef.p df

Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Chowne, A. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative group work in primary schools: Effects on science attainment. British Educational Research Journal, 33 (5), 663-680. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.

Berry, R. S. Y. (2004). Teachers' perceptions of their roles and their students' roles in the formative assessment process. Retrieved from http://publications.aare.edu.au/04pap/ber04978.pdf

Black, P. (2005). Formative assessment: Views through different lenses. Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 133-135.

Balcı, A., Akar, F., & Öztürk, İ. (2019). Exploring the meaningful work level of academics in terms of different variables. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 25(2), 241-284. doi:10.14527/kuey.2019.007

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Carreira, M. M. (2012). Formative assessment in HL teaching: Purposes, procedures, and practices. Heritage Language Journal, 9(1), 100-120.

Chevalier, J. (2011). Teachers' perception of Handheld Response Systems as a tool for formative assessment in high school classrooms. Retrieved from http://udini.proquest.com/view/teachers-perception-of-handheld-pqid:2523464481/

Chetchumlong, S. (2010). The effect of web-based formative assessment on students’ achievement and attitudes in a large enrolment tertiary English course. Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/8928/

Çimen, B., & Karadağ, E. (2019). Spiritual leadership, organizational culture, organizational silence and academic success of the school. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 25(1), 1-50. doi:10.14527/kuey.2019.001

Çimer, S. & Timuçin, M. (2008). Formative assessment perceptions and habits of primary school English teachers: Trabzon Case. IETC, 1223-1226. Devine, A. (2009). Formative assessments for English language learners. Retrieved from http://marzanoresearch.com/documents/Anthony_Devine.pdf

Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing language for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dudley-Evans, A. & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eslami, Z. R. (2010). Teachers’ voice vs. students’ voice: A needs analysis approach to English for academic purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 2-11.

Eslami, Z. R., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Quiroz, B. (2007). Needs analysis of Iranian EAP students. ESP Across Cultures, 4, 21-37.

Fahim, M., & Fahim, F. (2011). The difference between formative assessment through multiple choice questions and true false questions in Iranian intermediate EFL learners' grammar learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 906-911.

Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2007). Formative and summative assessments in the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.amle.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx

Ghoorchaei, B., Tavakoli, M., & Nejad Ansari, D. (2010). The impact of portfolio Assessment on Iranian EFL students’ essay writing: A process-oriented approach. GEMA online Journal of Language Studies, 10(3), 35-51.

Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

ijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference?. Educational Studies, 32(4), 399-409.

Griffin, P. (2007). The comfort of competence and the uncertainty of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 87-99.

Huhta, A. (2010). Diagnostic and formative assessment. In B. Spolsky & F.M. Hult (Eds.), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 469-482). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Hurst, C. (2011). Formative assessment: Tertiary student perceptions. In Jan Wright (Ed), Proceedings of the AARE Conference. Hobart, Tas.: Australian Association for Research in Education.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic purposes. New York: Routledge.

Jones, C. (2006). The vocational learning support programme: 16–19: Assessment for learning. Learning and Skills Development Agency, 1-50.

Lee, I. (2011). Formative assessment in EFL writing: An exploratory case study. Changing English, 18(1), 99-111.

Mazdayasna, G., & Tahririan, M. H. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of Iranian students: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 277-289.

McKenna, E. S. (2011). Student use of formative assessments and progress charts of formative assessments in the 7th grade science class. Retrieved from etd.lib.montana.edu/etd/2011/mckenna/McKennaE0811.pdf‎

Mohammed, A. (2013). Senior high school (SHS) social studies teachers’ formative assessment practices in Ghana. Retrieved from http://ir.uew.edu.gh:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/198

Perera, A. M. B., & Morgan, J. F. (2011). Student perceptions of the value of formative assessment in their academic development. Acta Hort (ISHS), 920, 141-148. Retrieved from http://www.actahort.org/books/920/920_17.htm

Ruland, J. W. (2011). The impact of using formative assessment attributes in daily instruction on student affect. Retrieved from http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/44/

Sach, E. (2012). Teachers and testing: An investigation into teachers’ perceptions of formative assessment. Educational Studies, 38(3), 261-276.

Shepard, L. A. (2005a). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-70.

Shepard, L.A. (2005b). Formative assessment: Caveat emptor. Paper presented at the ETS invitational conference on the future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning, New York.

Song, E., & Koh, K. (2010). Assessment for learning: Understanding teachers’ beliefs and practices. In 36th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA) Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www. iaea2010. com/fullpaper/104. pdf.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, J. Scribner, & E. Souberman. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Way, W.D., Dolan, R.P., & Nichols, P. (2010). Psychometric challenges and opportunities in implementing formative assessment. In Andrade H., & Cizek G.J. (Eds.) Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 297-315). New York: Routledge.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies