Learning Arabic using telegram in the laptop: The language learning style of Malaysian gifted learners
Abstract
This study is related to learning styles and technology; for example, the use of telegram in the laptop among Malaysian Gifted Learners (MGL) at Pusat GENIUS@Pintar Negara, UKM. This study aims to investigate the three research questions. The first research question, what is the visual-level of Arabic language learning- style using telegram in the laptop among MGL? Secondly, what is the auditory -level of Arabic language learning- style using telegram in the laptop among MGL? And Thirdly, what is the kinaesthetic-level of Arabic language learning-style using telegram in the laptop among MGL? The results of the finding indicate the MGLs are a high-level user of visual and kinaesthetic learning styles. As for the auditory-level, they are at a moderate level. This study suggests that MGLs can increase their creativity of learning when they focus on their most exciting subject if teachers can teach MGLs’ subject related to technology that includes visual and kinaesthetic.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, C. M., & Cross, T. L. (2000). Distance learning opportunities for academically gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 88-96. doi:10.4219/jsge-1999-618
Bernal,E. M. (2002).Three ways to achieve a more equitable representation of culturally and linguistically different students in GT programs. Roeper Review, 24, 82-88.
Çetinkaya,.C.(2014). The effect of gifted students’ creative problem solving program on creative thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (2014) 3722 – 3726.
Cheng,.Y,.L.(2019). Relationship between Learning Style and Learning Strategies of Mandarin Learners in Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences 16, Issue 1 (2019) 144-154. Malaysia.
Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Education World. (2012). https://www.educationworld.com/a_curr/technology-gifted-students.shtml
Farrell,. S,.J.(2016). Differentiating Technology for Gifted Learners. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/differentiating-technology-gifted-learners
Ford, D. Y.,& Grantham,T. C. (2003). Providing access for gifted culturally diverse students. Theory into Practice, 42,217-225.
Gagné, F. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo and G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65-80). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Gilakjani A.P, Ahmadi, S.M. (2011). The Effect of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Learning Styles on Language Teaching. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, 5, 496-472
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ (Stanford-Binet): Origin and development.Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
Kamis, M. S., Lubis, M. A., Mohamad, N., Kasim, A. A. M., & Sjahrony, A. (2017). The impact of metacognitive strategy (MCS) in reading Arabic text among SMK Agama students in Seremban. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(4), 222 –234.Available at: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-17
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68
Karnes, F. A., & Bean, S. M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
Kaufman, J,.Kaufman, S,.Beghetto, R, Burgess, S & Persson, R,. (2009). Creative Giftedness: Beginnings, Developments, and Future Promises. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6162-2_28.
Lohman, D. F. (1994). Spatially gifted, verbally inconvenienced. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.). Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 251-264). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
Neihart, M., Reis, S., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (Eds.). (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children. Washington, D.C.: The National Association for Gifted Children.
Ng, W., & Nicholas, H. (2007). Conceptualizing the use of online technologies for gifted secondary students. Roeper Review, 29, 190-196. doi:10.1080/02783190709554408
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Corwith, S. (2010). Distance education: Where it started and where it stands for gifted children and their educators. Gifted Child Today, 34(3), 16-24, 64-65. doi:10.1177/107621751103400306
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Gifted adolescents’ talent development through distance learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 7-35. doi:10.1177/016235320402800102
Phelan,D. (2018). Social and Emotional Learning Needs of Gifted Students. Phd Thesis.Walden University.
Plucker,J. A. (1996). Gifted Asian-Americanstudents: Identification, curricular and counseling concerns. Journal for the Education ofthe Gifted, 19,315-343.
Reid, J., (1987). The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students. Tesol Quarterly, 21(1), 87-110.
Reis, S. M. (2003). Gifted girls, twenty-five years later: Hopes realized and new challenges found. Roeper Review, 25, 154-157.
Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring definition of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, (2nd ed., pp. 246-280). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rivera,.J. (2014). Quiz: The Six Types of Gifted Child. Retrieved from http://www.jadeannrivera.com/quiz-the-six-types-of-gifted-child/
Saccuzzo, D. P.,Johnson, N. E., & Guertin,T. L. (1994). Identifying under represented disadvantaged gifted and talented children: A multifaceted approach (Vols. 1-2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED368095)
Silverman, L.K., & Freed, J.N. (1991). The Visual Spatial Learner. Davis Dyslexia Association International, www.dyslexia.com
Wallace, P. (2009). Distance learning for gifted students: Outcomes for elementary, middle, and high school aged students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 295-320. doi:10.4219/jeg2009-855
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (Eds.) (2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2017). Emotional intelligence in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 163–182. doi:10.1177/0261429417708879
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies