A Study of Needs Analysis at Turkish Gendarmerie in Terms of English for Specific Purposes

Ekrem Solak

Abstract


Problem Statement: English learning and teaching activities are crucial for Turkish Gendarmerie personnel serving both at home and in various regions of the world. However, there is no sound basis determining the language needs of the gendarmerie organization and personnel to lead them to accomplishment in joint missions.
Purpose of Study: This paper aims to investigate the language needs of the Turkish Gendarmerie in terms of English for Specific Purposes. It is expected that determining the language needs of the organization on scientific basis helps to reshape the language curriculum of the gendarmerie and finally it will help the accomplishment of the joint missions in terms of language proficiency.
Method: Two questionnaires were administered to 70 gendarmerie personnel who had English learning experience to understand the language needs of the organization. Then the collected data was presented through tables.
Findings and Results: The data collected reveals that speaking and writing skills should be emphasized and taken into consideration in assessment. In addition, language materials need to be improved or be supplemented by auxiliary documents.
Conclusion and Recommendations: The present study suggests that some steps need to be taken to improve the language proficiency of the gendarmerie personnel to meet the language requirements especially for joint missions. A new language teaching program should be prepared in terms of improving four language skills and topics should be introduced related to the gendarmerie jurisdiction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


BILC Constitution (2011). Retrieved on June 25, 2009 from http://www.dlielc.org/bilc/Constitution2004.doc

Breen, M. (1984). Processes in syllabus design general English syllabus design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Brown, J. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Boston: Heinle&Heinle.

Clark, J. L. (1987). Curriculum renewal in school foreign language learning. Oxford: O.U.P.

Crossey, M. (2005). Improving linguistic interoperability. NATO Review. Retrieved on June 30, 2009 from www.nato.int/docu/review/2005/issue2/english/art4.html.

Dubeau, J. (2006). An exploratory study of OPI ratings across NATO countries using the NATO STANAG 6001 scale. Master’s Thesis. Canada.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle&Heinle.

Hutchinson, T. and, Waters A.. (2006). English for specific purposes. U.K.: C.U.P.

Law No 2803 on Organization, Duties and Powers of Turkish Gendarmerie.

Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford: O.U.P.

Pehlivan, E. (2003). Analysis of ELT at TAFA advanced English course from content based instruction perspective. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ãstanbul.

Rabbini, R. (2002). An introduction to syllabus design and evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal May, 8 (5).

Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: C.U.P.

White, R.V. (1988). The ELT curriculum: Design, innovation and management. Oxford: Blackwell.

Yalden, J. (1987). Principles of course design. U.S.A: C.U.P.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies